Title : Appeals court decides Washington, DC gun restriction law defies Second Amendment
link : Appeals court decides Washington, DC gun restriction law defies Second Amendment
Appeals court decides Washington, DC gun restriction law defies Second Amendment
RT | Jul 25, 2017 |
© Jason Reed / Reuters |
The three-judge panel at the DC Circuit Court of Appeals voted 2-1 against the District of Columbia. Judges Thomas B. Griffith and Stephen F. Williams were in the majority, while Judge Karen L. Henderson dissented.
“We are bound to leave the District as much space to regulate as the Constitution allows – but no more,” wrote Judge Griffith in the decision issued Tuesday. “And the resulting decision rests on a rule so narrow that good-reason laws seem almost uniquely designed to defy it: that the law-abiding citizen’s right to bear common arms must enable the typical citizen to carry a gun.”
D.C. Circuit blocks D.C. from enforcing "good reason" gun law, which required applicant to show "good reason" to get concealed carry permit http://pic.twitter.com/lpXrde8fDg— Cogan Schneier (@CoganSchneier) July 25, 2017
For Tuesday’s ruling, the court combined two separate but related appeals, in which the plaintiffs sought an injunction against the District enforcing the “good reason” law. The law was challenged by Brian Wrenn and the Second Amendment Foundation, Inc. as well as Matthew Grace and the Pink Pistols, a group arguing that sexual minorities should be allowed to carry firearms for self-defense. Lower courts had denied the injunction to Wrenn and granted it to Grace.
The District had argued that its gun control laws were necessary for public safety, that DC was a densely populated urban area, and that the presence of federal officials warranted special security concerns.
The District’s law merited invalidation “regardless of its precise benefits,” because the Second Amendment “erects some absolute barriers that no gun law may breach,” the majority decision held.
In her dissent, Judge Henderson sided with the District that licensing laws were intended for “the prevention of crime and the promotion of public safety,” adding that the “core” Second Amendment right applies to possession of self-defense weapons at home, but not outside.
thus Article Appeals court decides Washington, DC gun restriction law defies Second Amendment
that is all articles Appeals court decides Washington, DC gun restriction law defies Second Amendment This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article Appeals court decides Washington, DC gun restriction law defies Second Amendment with the link address https://willhealthyliving.blogspot.com/2017/07/appeals-court-decides-washington-dc-gun.html
0 Response to "Appeals court decides Washington, DC gun restriction law defies Second Amendment"
Post a Comment